Since
my last blog I have done some research over the Internet to gain knowledge on New Zealand's child abuse statistics. The appalling increase which
shows yearly statistics getting higher and higher is what shocked me.
The
first step I took in researching New Zealand statistics which was
reading the “Statistical Report” for Child, Youth and Family
(CYF) for the year ending June 2010, released by The Ministry of
Social Development.
The
report stated that there was a increase in reports to CYF from
2005/06 to 2009/10 due to “New Zealand's increased awareness of the
need for the care and protection of children and a growing
willingness by communities to contact CYF where there are concerns
for a child's welfare” (p. 264). The question this raised for me was, how many
reports of concern were received? With further reading I came across
a chart that answered exactly that:
Number
of reports of concerned received:
Outcome
of initial assessment
of
report of concern |
2005/2006
Number |
2006/2007
Number |
2007/2008
Number |
2008/2009
Number |
2009/2010
Number |
Reports
of concern requiring
further
action |
46,541
|
43,845
|
40,739
|
49,224
|
55,494
|
Reports
of concern not requiring
further
action |
16,198
|
28,082
|
48,722
|
61,573
|
69,427
|
Total
reports of concern
received |
62,739
|
71,927
|
89,461
|
110,797
|
124,921
|
I
then discovered the age groups of children who were involved in these
reports concerning further action. As stated in the report, from 2007
to 2010 between 48% and 50% were children aged between 5 and 13 years
and between 34% and 36% were children under 5 years.
As
I continued reading I came across the ethnic group of these
children. I was interested in these findings as I had previously read that often society views child abuse as a cultural issue. Is child abuse a cultural issue? Harvey (2012), confirmed this is NOT the case when she explained "more and more New Zealander's believe child abuse is a cultural issue despite statistics showing that abuse does not discriminate between cultures" (p. 1) Additionally, the CYF report stated, between
45% and 47% were Māori, between
32% and 34% were New Zealand Pākehā 12% were Pacific children.
Abuse
or neglect was found in approximately two fifths of these
investigations and between
37% and 41% of these investigations led to findings of abuse or
neglect. The table below will give you further idea of the increase
in certain areas. However, I did notice over the period between 2005
to 2010 in certain areas there was some minor decreases.
Findings
from investigations of Care and Protection reports of concern
requiring further action
Type
of finding
|
2005/2006
Number |
2006/2007
Number |
2007/2008
Number |
2008/2009
Number |
2009/2010
Number |
Emotionally
abused
|
6,142
|
8256
|
8,664
|
10,938
|
12,535
|
Physically
abused
|
2,336
|
2,274
|
2,321
|
2,855
|
2,886
|
Sexually
abused
|
1,291
|
1,194
|
1,003
|
1,126
|
1,201
|
Neglected
|
4,199
|
4,486
|
4,302
|
4,677
|
4,403
|
Behavioural/relationship
difficulties |
4,657
|
4,461
|
4,154
|
4,256
|
5,007
|
Self-harm/suicidal
|
172
|
138
|
116
|
106
|
137
|
Not
found
|
26,011
|
22,921
|
19,334
|
25,486
|
29,313
|
Total
findings from
investigations |
44,808
|
43,730
|
39894
|
49444
|
55,482
|
After
discovering these statistics I was curious to what has been happening
in the last 2 years. Has there been an increase in these figures? Are
child abuse rates getting worse?
The
next article I read was a PDF article which showed recent police
statistics. This allowed me to discover that Child, Youth and Family,
received 150, 747 notifications throughout 2010/11 which was
horrendous increase from 71,927 in 2006/07. Providing my mathematical
skills are correct- I was able to calculate that in just three years
the statistics for these notifications increased by 78, 820. Why are
these numbers so high? This article stated that the increases are
largely due to family violence.
This
article also allowed me to detect that on average 9 children under
14 are killed in New Zealand every year by a member of their family
and babies under the age of one are most at risk. These numbers made
my heart ache and left me thinking- why family members? How could
you harm somebody who is connected to who you are and where you come
from? Somebody that you are “supposed” to love? This is something I am curious to discover whilst researching this issue.
Further
reading by Shanahan (2011), also helped me gain further knowledge
within this issue. Margot Shanahan who works for UNICEF explained
that “child abuse is a systematic problem in New Zealand” (p. 1).
Throughout her article she explains it is estimated that
approximately 15% of children are born at risk of abuse. She explains
that more than often people perceive the perpetrator as a male but
she explains that in 2 out of 5 instances this is not the case.
I
then chose to look at the 2012 statistics, questioning whether
or not there had been another increase?
Surprisingly,
after reading a New Zealand Herald article by Collins (2012), I have
come to learn there has been a 4% decrease in the findings of neglect
and abuse as reported by CYF. Collins then explains that this is
the first drop in the past 8 years and Nixon (cited in Collins, 2012), CYFS Chief Social
Worker states it is to soon to tell weather this will become a long
lasting effect but he says “the drop was encouraging” (p. 1).
Nixon, went on to explain throughout the article that even though
there has been a 4% decrease CYF still received 152, 800
notifications within the last year which is a 2053 increase from the
previous year, however, he clearly stated that they “found
slightly less child abuse” cases (p. 1).
Next time..
I wish to discover how New Zealand got here, discussing risk factors and reasons behind abuse which relate to the increase in high abuse statistics.
References
Collins, S., (2012). Fall in abuse case figures raises hopes. Retrieved 9 March, from
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10836273
Harvey, S., (2012). Child abuse stats. Retrieved 9 March, from www.kiwiblog.co.nz
Ministry of Social Development, (2010). The statistical report for the year ending June 2010.
Retrieved from, www.msd.govt.nz
Shanahan, M., (2011). Child abuse stats make sobering reading. Retrieved 9 March from,
http://www.3news.co.nz/Child-abuse-stats-make-sobering
reading/tabid/423/articleID/223052/Default.aspx
I wish to discover how New Zealand got here, discussing risk factors and reasons behind abuse which relate to the increase in high abuse statistics.
References
Collins, S., (2012). Fall in abuse case figures raises hopes. Retrieved 9 March, from
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10836273
Harvey, S., (2012). Child abuse stats. Retrieved 9 March, from www.kiwiblog.co.nz
Ministry of Social Development, (2010). The statistical report for the year ending June 2010.
Retrieved from, www.msd.govt.nz
Shanahan, M., (2011). Child abuse stats make sobering reading. Retrieved 9 March from,
http://www.3news.co.nz/Child-abuse-stats-make-sobering
reading/tabid/423/articleID/223052/Default.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment